Facebook Logo Facebook Logo 2 Twitter Logo i_gplus i_copyurl i_plus i_minus i_reddit i_envelope search youtube-play feed2 user-tie arrow-right-thick location icon-wagons icon-diesel icon-hatchback icon-hybrid enlarge shrink camera certificate check

Used Honda Ratings

Getting firsthand information from an actual car owner is one sure way to get an idea of car performance once it leaves the lot. Autobytel features real consumer reviews that give the unbiased experience of a car.

Choose Your Vehicle -
Search Car Ratings for Honda
Honda All Models
    • Overall
    • Comfort
    • Performance
    • Quality
    • Appearance

    2/20/2002 7:12:49 AM

    2002 Honda Accord - 3.0 EX w/Leather (A4) Coupe

    Pros: Suspension

    Cons: Tires---The Michelins are not good in rain, and cost 131.00 ea

    Advice: You cant lose with this car. They never break

    My fouth Accord, this is the best one I have owned. The build quality of this car is only matched by the Toyotas. I just traded a Subaru for this, and it is not in the same league. The AWD offered better traction, but thats it. My V6 cost $6k less, and offers better mileage, its more comfortable, and reliability is better. I drive a lot, so mileage piles up, and the Honda never has problems. A lot of parts wore out on the 99 Outback, the quality was not at all like the Honda. I added a few items on my Accord for performance, and spent time with people who live cars. They all marvel at the level of quality, how well built the Accord and Civics are, how everything fits, nothing is cheap. This car is fast, handles well, and is excellent in bad weather for only front wheel drive(std traction control). The bottom line is you cant lose with this car, I paid 23k for the V6 EX Coupe. At 100k, this car will be in excellent condition, that why they hold their resale value like Mercedes. The Accord is the best car for its cost, read the reviews. My only complaint is the stock tires,the Michelins are just OK, a Continental Contact, which cost 40 dollars less per tire, would be better

    • Overall
    • Comfort
    • Performance
    • Quality
    • Appearance

    2/1/2002 11:42:36 AM

    2002 Honda Accord - 3.0 EX w/Leather (A4) Sedan

    Pros: Appearance, the quality of material & components and technological features.

    Cons: Lack of additonal exterior and interior color chocies.

    Advice: If you're looking for overall quality, attention to detail and a good value, purchase any Honda product.

    Overall ride quality: smooth, quiet and very controlled. Love the powerful V6 power-train this car has. Also, love the car overall appearance and form.

    • Overall
    • Comfort
    • Performance
    • Quality
    • Appearance

    1/29/2002 6:35:54 PM

    2002 Honda Odyssey - LX

    Pros: The overall vehicle design, convenience, safety ratings

    Cons: The fact it is a mini-van

    Advice: Buy one!

    Smooth at highway (+) speeds, nice on corners

    • Overall
    • Comfort
    • Performance
    • Quality
    • Appearance

    1/26/2002 11:57:44 AM

    2002 Honda CR-V - LX (M5) 4x4

    Pros: My favorite feature would have to be the automatic transmission. I've been driving a manual transmission for much too long.

    Cons: The location of the gear shifter.

    Advice: Be wary of the gear shift lever while reaching for the radio.

    I really enjoy driving my CRV. It's a smooth ride and the sound system is great. I had been looking for an automobile that would be comfortable on long drives, and large enough to hold all the family needs. But not so large that it would be like driving a boat. I found it in the CRV. There's plenty of storage space, and room for five average size adults. On the least liked feature. The location of the gear shifter took some getting use to. On 3 occasions, while driving to work in the early morning darkness, I accidently bumped the lever when reaching for the radio. It was enough of a bump to push the lever into neutral! I'm aware of the possibility now, but still find that having to reach around the lever to select a radio station is a bit of an annoyance.

    • Overall
    • Comfort
    • Performance
    • Quality
    • Appearance

    1/22/2002 12:03:32 PM

    2002 Honda CR-V - EX (M5) 4x4

    Pros: the emergency brake.

    Cons: that the running boards are extra

    Advice: The $2000 difference is completely worth it for purchasing the EX

    I got my Honda on the strength of someone's recommendation who has the 1999 CR-V. I LOVE my car. It's totally cute, easy to handle, great interior features like storage bins and lots of floor space which is great for getting my 2 year old in and out. The gear shift (automatic) is on the dashboard and the emergency brake is hidden under the radio, and makes absolute design sense.

    • Overall
    • Comfort
    • Performance
    • Quality
    • Appearance

    1/18/2002 12:32:37 PM

    2002 Honda Accord - 2.3 LX (M5) Sedan

    Pros: supposed to be solid built

    Cons: noise, uncomfortable seating, low mpg at this class

    Advice: never trust the rating from internet site. Have a full test drive first.

    I have about 800 miles on my new accord. It's not as good as claimed by many internet sites. The noise of road and wind is huge. The mpg is ordinary(22 for city and 28 for highway). After 300 miles I noticed the dashboard noise. I have been to the dealer's 3 times and it's still there. Overall average quality compared with Buick or Camry. Never buy it again.

    • Overall
    • Comfort
    • Performance
    • Quality
    • Appearance

    1/17/2002 1:41:07 AM

    2002 Honda Odyssey - LX

    Pros: power and handling

    Cons: i would like brighter reversing lights

    Advice: go for it

    we got the lx with leather and dvd. we love it best car I ever owned we traded a 2001 odyssey lx and I loved that. But the new one has more power, 5 speed auto,4 wheel disc brakes, side air bags, better sound system, the dvd works great, overall worth every penny of the $30,000 best of all the trade in value on the 2001 odyssey was great