Mazda CX-5 to Start under $21,000

Showcasing advanced SKYACTIV powertrain technologies, the all-new 2013 Mazda CX-5—Autobytel’s 2012 Crossover of the Year—will debut with some of the highest fuel-efficiency ratings in its class while still boasting one of the segment’s lowest MSRPs: $20,695. It’s a combination that should hit ye olde sweet spot for Mazda, which has begun using its SKYACTIV components to bring leading levels of fuel economy to a lineup that’s usually more well known for its driving dynamics.

The automaker first introduced SKYACTIV tech to the U.S. in the 2012 MAZDA3, and the results were well-nigh instantaneous. Last month, with the SKYACTIV models now on the roster—and capable of up to 40 mpg highway—the MAZDA3 posted its best January sales ever, reaping a massive 83.4 increase in deliveries over the same month in 2011. And that, in turn, helped the automaker’s overall lineup grow sales by 68.2 percent on deliveries of 23,996 units—the most vehicles Mazda has sold in January in almost 20 years.

That’s no doubt the kind of success the company is hoping for with the CX-5, and a quick look at the numbers shows Mazda in a strong competitive position in the very important entry-crossover segment. Here’s how the CX-5 fits in among the current usual suspects (in their high-efficiency, front-wheel-drive configurations):

• Mazda CX-5, $20,695, 26 mpg city/35 mpg highway/29 mpg combined

Kia Sportage, $20,800, 22/32/25

Ford Escape, $21,440, 23/28/25

Nissan Rogue, $21,840, 23/28/25

Honda CR-V, $22,295, 23/31/26

• Toyota RAV4, $22,650, 22/28/24

Kia Sorento, $23,150, 21/29/24

• Chevy Equinox, $23,530, 22/32/26

Now, there is one big caveat here: except for the CX-5 and the Escape, all other entries on this list rely on automatic transmissions. While a lot can be said about the pleasures of rowing your own gears in a zoom-enhanced Mazda, the vast majority of customers will prefer the automatic, and putting a slushbox in the Mazda brings its ratings down a bit, to 26 mpg city and 32 mpg highway, with the combined mark still to be determined. Then there’s the Ford factor.