New 2010 Honda CR-V vs. 2010 Toyota RAV4
The new 2010 Honda CR-V and 2010 Toyota RAV4 are two of the best-selling compact SUVs of all time. Both models offer an affordable price tag, interior versatility and some of the best fuel figures in the class. Compare the new 2010 Honda CR-V and 2010 Toyota RAV4 to determine which model better suits your needs.Styling - New 2010 Honda CR-V vs. 2010 Toyota RAV4
|
|
Both of these SUV models take a styling approach that is meant to appeal to a wide audience. Of the two, the Honda CR-V might be described as more of a "cute-ute." Its round features and arching window frames soften the whole look and give it an inviting and conservative silhouette. While by no means aggressive, the RAV4 may appeal more to those who are looking for a rugged and sporty SUV.
On the inside, both models are well-equipped and offer good quality in the class. However, the fit and finish of the CR-V is just a smidge better than that of the RAV4.
Check out Honda CR-V photos and Toyota RAV-4 photos.
| Specification | Honda CR-V | Toyota RAV4 |
| Length: | 179.3 inches | 181.9 inches |
| Width: | 71.6 inches | 71.5 inches |
| Height: | 66.1 inches | 66.3 inches |
| Ground Clearance: | 6.7 inches | 7.5 inches |
Interior Space - New 2010 Honda CR-V vs. 2010 Toyota RAV4
|
|
When comparing the interiors, the first thing you might want to consider is how many passengers you're hoping to haul. The Toyota RAV4 comes with an optional third row of seating, while the CR-V does not. While that third-row is pretty cramped, it can be a great feature in a pinch. Front- and second-row seats on both vehicles are plenty comfy and should provide enough support to get you through the occasional road trip with no complaints.
In terms of hauling, the RAV4 edges out the CR-V with a total cargo capacity of 73 cubic feet. However, the Honda CR-V comes in a close second with 72.9 cubic feet. Add in a more user-friendly rear hatch, and the CR-V may prove a better choice for frequent haulers.
| Specification | Honda CR-V | Toyota RAV4 |
| Front Head Room: | 40.9 inches | 40.8 inches |
| Rear Head Room: | 38.6 inches | 39.7 inches |
| Rear Leg Room: | 38.5 inches | 41.8 inches |
| Maximum Cargo: | 72.9 cubic feet | 73.0 cubic feet |
| Maximum Seating: | 5 | 7 |
Pricing and Features - New 2010 Honda CR-V vs. 2010 Toyota RAV4
|
|
Base prices for the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are $21,545 and $21,675, respectively. To compare different trim levels, check out our Honda CR-V prices and Toyota RAV4 prices pages.
Both the RAV4 and CR-V start with a good mix of standard features. Air conditioning, cruise control, full power accessories and keyless entry are a few items matched by each competitor. If you want sportier upgrades, then the RAV4 may fit the bill with options that include sport suspension tuning and roof rails. The CR-V is more family friendly, with unique features that include a retractable front center tray table and 40/20/40 rear seats that slide and recline for interior versatility.
| Honda CR-V | Toyota RAV4 |
| Base LX: $21,545 | Base: $21,675 |
| CR-V EX: $23,845 | RAV4 Sport: $23,375 |
| CR-V EX-L: $26,495 | RAV4 Limited: $24,665 |
Performance - New 2010 Honda CR-V vs. 2010 Toyota RAV4
|
|
Base engines are fairly comparable when it comes to power. The RAV4 offers 179 horsepower while the CR-V outputs 180 horsepower. Of the two, the CR-V offers a slightly more car-like driving experience. However, the lack of a V-6 upgrade model may turn off those who want some added power. If such is the case, then the 269-hp V-6 available for the RAV4 will likely be your model of choice.
Fuel efficiency is impressive for both models. However, the Toyota RAV4 wins by a nose with an EPA-estimated 22 mpg in the city and 28 mpg on the highway. In comparison, the CR-V delivers 21 mpg in the city and 28 mpg on the highway.
Review Honda CR-V specifications and Toyota RAV4 specifications.
| Specification | Honda CR-V | Toyota RAV4 |
| Base Horsepower: | 180 hp | 179 hp |
| Base Toque: | 161 lb-ft. | 172 lb-ft. |
| Tow Capacity: | 1,500 lbs. | 1,500 lbs. |
| MPG (city/hwy/combined): | 21/28/24 | 22/28/24 |
Safety - New 2010 Honda CR-V vs. 2010 Toyota RAV4
|
|
The CR-V and RAV4 both come standard with front, side and side curtain airbags, antilock disc brakes, traction control and stability control. In most crash test categories, each model earns the highest marks possible. However, the CR-V loses some points in roof strength tests. If this is a concern to you, then the RAV4 may provide additional peace of mind.
| Specification | Honda CR-V | Toyota RAV4 |
| IIHS Frontal Offset: | Good | Good |
| IIHS Side Impact: | Good | Good |
| Roof Strength: | Marginal | Average |
Our Choice: 2010 Honda CR-V
While both cars are incredibly good buys, the 2010 Honda CR-V edges out the RAV4 thanks to its all-around better versatility. Overall, the CR-V delivers a more comfortable drive, is a bit more user-friendly for storing cargo and is just slightly more affordable. Still, if you need room for seven or desire a more rugged and sporty SUV, then the Toyota RAV4 may better fit your personal needs.