Getting the most gas mileage for your money, no matter what you buy
By Ron Perry and Christian Wardlaw
|
November 15, 2005
Introduction
People used to buy cars based on styling and their bank balance, but today many consumers factor crash-test scores, reliability records, and with recent increases in gas prices, fuel economy into the equation. To battle the rising costs of fuel, consumers can choose from an increasing number of gasoline/electric hybrid cars, but most of these models don’t meet a general consumer’s needs in one way or another. Plus, they command a premium that takes years to recoup at the pump.Fortunately, automakers have taken aim at improving fuel economy across the board, keeping up on which cars and trucks get the best mileage within specific size and price classes still isn’t easy. To make your decision-making process simpler, we have compiled a list of the most fuel-efficient vehicles by class. This list is more useful than the typical Top 10 list, which normally includes small cars with hybrid and diesel powertrains that address the needs of few consumers. By using our list, the work truck buyer is served just as well as the family SUV buyer and eco-conscious commuter.
Our rankings are based on the combined EPA fuel economy rating of vehicles equipped with an automatic transmission, the most common choice among car buyers. There are two exceptions to this system. First, the hybrids are in their own category, since they easily swept four of the vehicle classes. Second, we divided the luxury category by sub-segment, in order to give shoppers a more accurate view of luxury branded vehicles.
The winner in each category gets a nice, pretty picture and a brief summary. And if the top model doesn’t please you, we list the four runners-up.. Keep in mind, too, that some vehicles are available with a manual transmission, and you can usually get better fuel economy by rowing your own gears.
Two Seaters
1st Place: 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 26 mpg
Powertrain: 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 6-speed automatic
The new 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata a kick to drive, and it wins the EPA’s two-seater category for the best fuel economy. Not a bad combination, and with the MX-5’s new automatic transmission (including paddle-shifters for clutch-impaired enthusiasts), the new Miata is entertaining even if you’re not stirring a stick.
Mini-compact Car
1st Place: 2006 Mini Cooper
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 29 mpg
Powertrain: 1.6 liter, 4 cyl., CVT
Really, it is just coincidence that the “Mini” Cooper wins the EPA’s mini-compact segment for best fuel efficiency. Keep in mind that this winning model has the lower-powered 115-horse motor, not the Cooper S version’s racy supercharged engine. But still, having captured the hearts of American car buyers since its re-introduction to the U.S., it’s nice to see a stylish, fun, even practical little hatch top one of our lists. Zipping around in a Mini Cooper is fun, and owning one won’t empty your wallet at the pump.
Sub-compact Car
1st Place: 2006 Volkswagen New Beetle TDI
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 38 mpg
Powertrain: 1.9 liter, 4 cyl., 6-AT
With a combined EPA fuel economy rating of 38 mpg, the spunky 2006 Volkswagen New Beetle TDI is one alternative to a hybrid, though its turbodiesel engine pollutes more than any gas/electric model on the market – or even the second-place runner up, the 2006 Honda Civic. Of course, if you live in Green regions such as California and New England, you can forget about the New Beetle TDI, as emissions regulations exclude the sale of dirty diesels. If you’re still interested, however, the 1.9-liter turbodiesel – torquey enough for city driving – combined with the New Beetle’s classic design and impressive fuel economy makes this VW a great choice.
Luxury Sub-compact Car
1st Place: 2006 Acura RSX
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 28 mpg
Powertrain: 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT
Luxurious only in name, the useful and fun 2006 Acura RSX tops the list of small upscale automobiles. Stylish, reliable, and wearing a luxury badge, the RSX is worthy of consideration if you’re not looking for premium materials and a refined driving experience. This car is a bit loud and raucous, though impeccably assembled. If real luxury is what you want, the new Lexus IS 250 slots in right behind the Acura.
Compact Car
1st Place: 2006 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 38 mpg
Powertrain: 1.9 liter, 4 cyl., 6-AT
Appealing to the young, the old, and everyone in between, the Volkswagen Jetta’s upscale looks and versatile interior combine to create a just-right recipe for people looking for a comfortable, economical sedan. But this class-leading version is equipped with a turbodiesel engine, and is not sold in California or New England because it cannot pass emissions standards in those regions. That means you’ve gotta choose the next best sedan if you want to run on regular unleaded: the 2006 Toyota Corolla.
Luxury Compact Car
1st Place: 2006 Audi A4 2.0T
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 27 mpg
Powertrain: 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., CVT
You can buy a luxury sedan and get great fuel economy. Leading several efficient models, the 2006 Audi A4, with its new 2.0-liter, direct-injection engine, bubbles to the top when it comes to efficiency in the luxury compact class. Better yet, Audi provides performance in addition to economy. And with a long list of available features, A4 buyers sacrifice few luxury comforts and conveniences – you can option one of these appealing sedans to nearly $40,000.
Mid-size Car
1st Place (tie): 2006 Honda Accord
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 28
Powertrain: 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT
1st Place (tie): 2006 Kia Spectra
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 28
Powertrain: 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place (tie): 2006 Toyota Camry
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 28
Powertrain: 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT
Shoppers have several choices in the mid-size category. Our pick of the three top-ranked vehicles in this class is the 2006 Honda Accord, which gets appealing new rear styling this year. The Accord’s four-cylinder engine also gets a power bump for 2006, making it the most powerful of the trio of 1st Place winners. And if the Accord fails to excite you, there are many models from which to choose that get within 4 mpg of the Honda, including a few with six-cylinder engines.
Luxury Mid-size Car
1st Place: 2006 Mercedes-Benz E320 CDI
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 30
Powertrain: 3.2 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT
Wealthy people don’t get rich by spending foolishly, and diesel-powered Mercedes models have long been favored by upper-crust Americans who have money and want to keep it that way. Historically, the trade-off for better fuel economy was plenty of clatter and smoke. Today, the 2006 Mercedes-Benz E320 CDI is quieter, cleaner, and more efficient than ever, able to travel five more miles per gallon of fuel than the next-best competitor. But to take advantage of this opulent sedan’s greater highway range you’ve gotta live somewhere other than California and New England, where strict emissions regulations keep the E320 CDI off the roads.
Large Car
1st Place: 2006 Hyundai Sonata
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 27
Powertrain: 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
Hyundai continues its ascent into the global automotive marketplace by building better cars and offering them at better prices equipped with better warranties. Topping the fuel economy ratings can’t hurt either, and in our recent review of the new 2006 Hyundai Sonata, which takes the blue medal ribbon in the large car category, we gave this roomy sedan high marks. But wait, you say, isn’t the Sonata a mid-size car? Not according to the EPA. If you find this distinction by the feds a dubious one, your next best bets for a big, fuel-efficient car are the Chevrolet Malibu Maxx and Toyota Avalon.
Luxury Large Car
1st Place (tie): Jaguar XJ8/XJ8 L
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 21
Powertrain: 4.2 liter, 8 cyl., 6-AT
1st Place (tie): Lexus LS 430
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 21
Powertrain: 4.3 liter, 8 cyl., 6-AT
1st Place (tie): Mercedes S430
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 21
Powertrain: 4.3 liter, 8 cyl., 7-AT
Fuel costs are of little consequence for most people buying large luxury cars. But for those that watch every penny, three cars in this class tied on fuel economy. All three are worthy opponents offering the best of what their manufacturers have to offer, but our pick is the 2006 Lexus LS 430. Though a bit on the dull side, the Lexus will delight its owner in its comfort, simplicity, and quality. Add to that a combined EPA fuel economy rating of 21 mpg, and it’s easy to pass on the beautiful Jaguar and envy-inspiring Benz.
Small Wagon
1st Place (tie): 2006 Pontiac Vibe
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 31
Powertrain: 1.8 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place (tie): 2006 Scion xB
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 31
Powertrain: 1.5 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place (tie): 2006 Toyota Matrix
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 31
Powertrain: 1.8 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
Many consumers in need of cargo carrying space can avoid an expensive, fuel-thirsty SUV by choosing a small station wagon. Sure, the EPA calls them station wagons, but you can call them whatever lets you sleep at night. Choose something like Active Lifestyle Support Vehicle, or ALSV – the hottie at the gym won’t know what the heck you’re talking about, and you’ll be saving enough moolah to actually go on a date. Our pick of the top three in the class is the boxy Scion xB. Sure, it generates the least amount of power, but it’s fresh, functional and can be customized with a wide variety of dealer-installed equipment.
Small Luxury Wagon
1st Place: 2006 Audi A3 2.0T
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 28
Powertrain: 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 6-AT
The 2006 Audi A3 is a fun-to-drive five-door offering the versatility of a small SUV with the comfort of a luxury sedan. Equipped with a zippy 2.0-liter, direct-injection motor combined with tight European handling characteristics, the Audi A3 is a must-drive when shopping for a small luxury wagon. Adding even more to its allure is the fact that it can go three more miles on every gallon of fuel than the 2nd place runners-up.
Mid-size Wagon
1st Place: 2006 Ford Focus
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 28
Powertrain: 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
Sure, you think the 2006 Ford Focus is a small car, but the wizards at the EPA claim it’s a mid-size model thanks to a classification system based on total interior volume – including the cargo area. And the Focus has a big cargo area. If you’re looking to combine fuel-efficiency with an emphasis on people-toting ability, check out the larger Subaru Legacy, which gets added power for 2006. But there’s no denying that the Focus is a fun-to-drive family hauler with a distinctive European look.
Mid-size Luxury Wagon
1st Place: 2006 Volvo V70 2.5T
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 24
Powertrain: 2.5 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT
Mid-size luxury wagons have enjoyed a recent resurgence in popularity, and the Volvo V70 has proven to be one of the sales leaders in the class, a favorite of families for its legacy of safety. But there’s another reason to choose the Volvo when shopping for a luxury wagon. When it comes to fuel economy, the V70 tops the field with a combined rating of 24 mpg.
Standard Truck, 2WD
1st Place: 2006 Ford Ranger
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 23
Powertrain: 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT
1st Place: 2006 Mazda B2300
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 23
Powertrain: 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT
1st Place: 2006 Toyota Tacoma
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 23
Powertrain: 2.7 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
Though the 2006 Ford Ranger and 2006 Mazda B-Series also rank first, our choice here is the 2006 Toyota Tacoma. Completely redesigned last year, the Tacoma is roomier and more refined, though it’s also more expensive. If you just need a good, cheap, fuel-efficient truck, get the Mazda. It’s the same thing as a Ranger, but with a better warranty. And if you need something bigger, try the Toyota Tundra with the base 4.0-liter V6.
Standard Truck, 4WD
1st Place: 2006 Chevrolet Colorado
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 19
Powertrain(s): 2.8 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT; 3.5 liter, 5 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place: 2006 GMC Canyon
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 19
Powertrain(s): 2.8 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT; 3.5 liter, 5 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place: 2006 Isuzu i-350
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 19
Powertrain(s): 3.5 liter, 5 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place: 2006 Toyota Tacoma
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 19
Powertrain(s): 4.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT
The 2006 Chevrolet Colorado, 2006 GMC Canyon, and 2006 Isuzu i-350 are all at the top of the 4WD pickup class at 19 mpg because they are essentially the same vehicles with the same engines. Our pick, however, is the larger, more refined 2006 Toyota Tacoma which ties this trio. And if you don’t need real off-road capability, the 2006 Honda Ridgeline, in 2nd Place, is an outstanding alternative. Full-size truck buyers will want to examine the 2006 Chevrolet Silverado and 2006 GMC Sierra if fuel economy is a strong consideration.
Minivan
1st Place: 2006 Honda Odyssey
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 23
Powertrain: 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT
Clearly, all minivans on the market cluster around the 20-mpg mark when it comes to combined fuel economy ratings. But just one gets 23 mpg, and that’s the 2006 Honda Odyssey, thanks in part to its Variable Cylinder Management system that cuts fuel to three of the engine’s six cylinders when cruising on the highway. The Honda Odyssey was already the minivan to beat, and landing in the top slot with the best fuel economy in the class cements its post as the standard bearer.
SUV, 2WD
1st Place: 2006 Chevrolet HHR
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 25
Powertrain: 2.2 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place: 2006 Honda CR-V
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 25
Powertrain: 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT
Why the EPA thinks that the 2006 Chevrolet HHR, which is basically a Chevy Cobalt station wagon, is a sport/utility vehicle is a mystery, but since our choice in the category, the 2006 Honda CR-V, is a jacked-up Civic with a big box hanging off the back, who are we to judge? We give the nod to the CR-V for its larger size, greater space, and more powerful engine. Plus, the darn things have proven to be nearly bulletproof in terms of reliability.
SUV, 4WD
1st Place: 2006 Subaru Forester
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 25
Powertrain: 2.5 liter 4 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place: 2006 Subaru Outback
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 25
Powertrain: 2.5 liter 4 cyl., 4-AT
Subaru locks up first place in the 4WD SUV category with two separate models that use the same, horizontally-opposed, flat four-cylinder drivetrain – the restyled 2006 Forester and the appealing 2006 Outback. Though close in overall size and identical in terms of power, performance, and fuel economy, the Forester appeals more to those looking for the boxy, upright styling of a traditional SUV while the Outback is more like a car or station wagon in terms of appearance. Of the two, the Outback is our favorite, though either will prove to be a reliable weather-beater for years to come.
Luxury SUV
1st Place: 2006 Lexus RX 330 2WD
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 22
Powertrain: 3.3 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT
1st Place: 2006 Volvo XC70
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 22
Powertrain: 2.5-liter, 5-cyl., 5-AT
Since the 2006 Volvo XC70 is merely a Volvo station wagon raised a few inches for more ground clearance, it’s not surprising that it ties for first with the 2006 Lexus RX 330 in the Luxury SUV category. Comfortable and sure-footed in all kinds of weather, the XC70 is a fine, if often overlooked, sport-ute. But our choice here is the Lexus, unless you absolutely require four driven wheels (and if so, the RX 330 AWD slots into 2nd Place). But if you need real off-roading capability, your best bet is the 2006 Hummer H3, Lexus GX 470, or Porsche Cayenne.
Hybrids
1st Place: 2006 Honda Insight
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 56 mpg
Vehicle Classification: Two-seater
Honda’s odd-looking Insight, the first hybrid to go on sale to consumers in North America, is also the thriftiest with fuel – but just barely. The much larger, more comfortable, impressively refined, and surprisingly useful Toyota Prius nips at the Insight’s heels. We’d recommend skipping the Insight for the Prius any day of the week, though with just a handful sold each year, you can bet there’s no waiting line at the Honda dealer for this funky two-seater.
1st Place: 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 26 mpg
Powertrain: 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 6-speed automatic
The new 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata a kick to drive, and it wins the EPA’s two-seater category for the best fuel economy. Not a bad combination, and with the MX-5’s new automatic transmission (including paddle-shifters for clutch-impaired enthusiasts), the new Miata is entertaining even if you’re not stirring a stick.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Chrysler Crossfire | 24 | 3.2 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
| 3rd Place | Audi TT Convertible | 23 | 1.8 liter, 4 cyl., 6-AT |
| Mercedes SLK 280 | 23 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 7-AT | |
| 4th Place | Audi TT Quattro Convertible | 21 | 3.2 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT |
| Chevrolet Corvette | 21 | 6.0 liter, 8 cyl., 6-AT | |
| Mercedes SLK 350 | 21 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 7-AT | |
| Nissan 350Z | 21 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Porsche Boxster | 21 | 2.7 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Porsche Boxster S | 21 | 3.2 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 5th Place | Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 | 20 | 3.2 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
Mini-compact Car
1st Place: 2006 Mini Cooper
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 29 mpg
Powertrain: 1.6 liter, 4 cyl., CVT
Really, it is just coincidence that the “Mini” Cooper wins the EPA’s mini-compact segment for best fuel efficiency. Keep in mind that this winning model has the lower-powered 115-horse motor, not the Cooper S version’s racy supercharged engine. But still, having captured the hearts of American car buyers since its re-introduction to the U.S., it’s nice to see a stylish, fun, even practical little hatch top one of our lists. Zipping around in a Mini Cooper is fun, and owning one won’t empty your wallet at the pump.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Volkswagen New Beetle Convertible | 25 | 2.5 liter, 5 cyl., 6-AT |
| 3rd Place | Audi TT | 24 | 1.8 liter, 4 cyl., 6-AT |
| 4th Place | Audi TT Quattro | 22 | 3.2 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT |
| Porsche 911 Carrera 2 | 22 | 3.6 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 5th Place | BMW 325Ci | 21 | 2.5 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
| BMW 330Ci | 21 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Jaguar XK8 | 21 | 4.2 liter, 8 cyl., 6-AT | |
| Lexus SC 430 | 21 | 4.3 liter, 8 cyl., 6-AT | |
| Porsche 911 Carrera 2S | 21 | 3.6 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Porsche 911 Carrera 4 | 21 | 3.6 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Porsche 911 Carrera 4S | 21 | 3.8 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
Sub-compact Car
1st Place: 2006 Volkswagen New Beetle TDI
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 38 mpg
Powertrain: 1.9 liter, 4 cyl., 6-AT
With a combined EPA fuel economy rating of 38 mpg, the spunky 2006 Volkswagen New Beetle TDI is one alternative to a hybrid, though its turbodiesel engine pollutes more than any gas/electric model on the market – or even the second-place runner up, the 2006 Honda Civic. Of course, if you live in Green regions such as California and New England, you can forget about the New Beetle TDI, as emissions regulations exclude the sale of dirty diesels. If you’re still interested, however, the 1.9-liter turbodiesel – torquey enough for city driving – combined with the New Beetle’s classic design and impressive fuel economy makes this VW a great choice.
| Runner-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Honda Civic | 34 | 1.8-liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT |
| Scion xA | 34 | 1.5 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| 3rd Place | Chevrolet Aveo | 28 | 1.6 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| 4th Place | Chevrolet Cobalt | 27 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| 5th Place | Scion tC | 26 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| Volkswagen New Beetle | 26 | 2.5 liter, 4 cyl., 6-AT |
Luxury Sub-compact Car
1st Place: 2006 Acura RSX
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 28 mpg
Powertrain: 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT
Luxurious only in name, the useful and fun 2006 Acura RSX tops the list of small upscale automobiles. Stylish, reliable, and wearing a luxury badge, the RSX is worthy of consideration if you’re not looking for premium materials and a refined driving experience. This car is a bit loud and raucous, though impeccably assembled. If real luxury is what you want, the new Lexus IS 250 slots in right behind the Acura.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Lexus IS 250 | 27 | 2.5 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT |
| 3rd Place | Audi A4 Cabriolet | 26 | 1.8 liter, 4 cyl., CVT |
| 4th Place | Lexus IS 250 AWD | 25 | 2.5 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT |
| 5th Place | Lexus IS 350 | 24 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT |
Compact Car
1st Place: 2006 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 38 mpg
Powertrain: 1.9 liter, 4 cyl., 6-AT
Appealing to the young, the old, and everyone in between, the Volkswagen Jetta’s upscale looks and versatile interior combine to create a just-right recipe for people looking for a comfortable, economical sedan. But this class-leading version is equipped with a turbodiesel engine, and is not sold in California or New England because it cannot pass emissions standards in those regions. That means you’ve gotta choose the next best sedan if you want to run on regular unleaded: the 2006 Toyota Corolla.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Volkswagen Golf TDI | 37 | 1.9 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT |
| 3rd Place | Toyota Corolla | 33 | 1.8 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| 4th Place | Hyundai Accent | 32 | 1.6 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| Kia Rio | 32 | 1.6 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| 5th Place | Nissan Sentra | 30 | 1.8 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
Luxury Compact Car
1st Place: 2006 Audi A4 2.0T
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 27 mpg
Powertrain: 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., CVT
You can buy a luxury sedan and get great fuel economy. Leading several efficient models, the 2006 Audi A4, with its new 2.0-liter, direct-injection engine, bubbles to the top when it comes to efficiency in the luxury compact class. Better yet, Audi provides performance in addition to economy. And with a long list of available features, A4 buyers sacrifice few luxury comforts and conveniences – you can option one of these appealing sedans to nearly $40,000.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Audi A4 2.0T Quattro | 25 | 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 6-AT |
| Saab 9-3 | 25 | 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Volvo S40 | 25 | 2.4 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Volvo S60 2.5T | 25 | 2.5 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 3rd Place | Audi A4 3.2 | 24 | 3.1 liter, 6 cyl., CVT |
| BMW 325i | 24 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT | |
| BMW 330i | 24 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT | |
| Mercedes C230 | 24 | 2.5 liter, 6 cyl., 7-AT | |
| Volvo S60 2.4 | 24 | 2.4 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 4th Place | BMW 325xi | 23 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT |
| BMW 330xi | 23 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT | |
| Mercedes C280 | 23 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 7-AT | |
| Mercedes C350 | 23 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 7-AT | |
| Volvo S40 AWD | 23 | 2.5 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Volvo S60 2.5T AWD | 23 | 2.5 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 5th Place | Audi A4 3.2 Quattro | 22 | 3.1 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT |
| Mercedes C280 4Matic | 22 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
Mid-size Car
1st Place (tie): 2006 Honda Accord
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 28
Powertrain: 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT
1st Place (tie): 2006 Kia Spectra
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 28
Powertrain: 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place (tie): 2006 Toyota Camry
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 28
Powertrain: 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT
Shoppers have several choices in the mid-size category. Our pick of the three top-ranked vehicles in this class is the 2006 Honda Accord, which gets appealing new rear styling this year. The Accord’s four-cylinder engine also gets a power bump for 2006, making it the most powerful of the trio of 1st Place winners. And if the Accord fails to excite you, there are many models from which to choose that get within 4 mpg of the Honda, including a few with six-cylinder engines.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Chevrolet Malibu | 27 | 2.2 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| Ford Fusion | 27 | 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Hyundai Elantra | 27 | 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mercury Milan | 27 | 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 3rd Place | Chevrolet Malibu | 26 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT |
| Mazda 6 | 26 | 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Nissan Altima 2.5 | 26 | 2.5 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| 4th Place | Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 25 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT |
| Chrysler Sebring Sedan | 25 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Dodge Stratus | 25 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Kia Optima | 25 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mitsubishi Galant | 25 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Volkswagen Passat 2.0T | 25 | 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 6-AT | |
| 5th Place | Chrysler Sebring Sedan | 24 | 2.7 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT |
| Dodge Stratus | 24 | 2.7 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Ford Fusion | 24 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT | |
| Mercury Milan | 24 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT | |
| Pontiac Grand Prix | 24 | 3.8 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Toyota Camry | 24 | 3.3 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
Luxury Mid-size Car
1st Place: 2006 Mercedes-Benz E320 CDI
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 30
Powertrain: 3.2 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT
Wealthy people don’t get rich by spending foolishly, and diesel-powered Mercedes models have long been favored by upper-crust Americans who have money and want to keep it that way. Historically, the trade-off for better fuel economy was plenty of clatter and smoke. Today, the 2006 Mercedes-Benz E320 CDI is quieter, cleaner, and more efficient than ever, able to travel five more miles per gallon of fuel than the next-best competitor. But to take advantage of this opulent sedan’s greater highway range you’ve gotta live somewhere other than California and New England, where strict emissions regulations keep the E320 CDI off the roads.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Lexus GS 300 | 25 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT |
| 3rd Place | Audi A6 3.2 | 24 | 3.1 liter, 6 cyl., CVT |
| BMW 525i | 24 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT | |
| BMW 530i | 24 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT | |
| Lexus ES 330 | 24 | 3.3 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Volvo S80 | 24 | 2.5 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 4th Place | Acura TL | 23 | 3.2 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
| BMW 525xi | 23 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT | |
| BMW 530xi | 23 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT | |
| Lexus GS 300 AWD | 23 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT | |
| 5th Place | Audi A6 3.2 Quattro | 22 | 3.1 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT |
| Jaguar S-Type 3.0 | 22 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT | |
| Mercedes E350 | 22 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 7-AT | |
| Volvo S80 AWD | 22 | 2.5 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT |
Large Car
1st Place: 2006 Hyundai Sonata
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 27
Powertrain: 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
Hyundai continues its ascent into the global automotive marketplace by building better cars and offering them at better prices equipped with better warranties. Topping the fuel economy ratings can’t hurt either, and in our recent review of the new 2006 Hyundai Sonata, which takes the blue medal ribbon in the large car category, we gave this roomy sedan high marks. But wait, you say, isn’t the Sonata a mid-size car? Not according to the EPA. If you find this distinction by the feds a dubious one, your next best bets for a big, fuel-efficient car are the Chevrolet Malibu Maxx and Toyota Avalon.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Chevrolet Malibu Maxx | 25 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT |
| Toyota Avalon | 25 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 3rd Place | Chevrolet Impala | 24 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT |
| Chrysler 300 | 24 | 2.7 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Ford Five Hundred | 24 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT | |
| Hyundai Sonata | 24 | 3.3 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Mercury Montego | 24 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT | |
| 4th Place | Ford Five Hundred | 23 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., CVT |
| Mercury Montego | 23 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., CVT | |
| 5th Place | Buick Lucerne | 22 | 3.8 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT |
| Chevrolet Impala | 22 | 3.9 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Chevrolet Impala SS | 22 | 5.3 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Chrysler 300 | 22 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Dodge Charger | 22 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
Luxury Large Car
1st Place (tie): Jaguar XJ8/XJ8 L
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 21
Powertrain: 4.2 liter, 8 cyl., 6-AT
1st Place (tie): Lexus LS 430
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 21
Powertrain: 4.3 liter, 8 cyl., 6-AT
1st Place (tie): Mercedes S430
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 21
Powertrain: 4.3 liter, 8 cyl., 7-AT
Fuel costs are of little consequence for most people buying large luxury cars. But for those that watch every penny, three cars in this class tied on fuel economy. All three are worthy opponents offering the best of what their manufacturers have to offer, but our pick is the 2006 Lexus LS 430. Though a bit on the dull side, the Lexus will delight its owner in its comfort, simplicity, and quality. Add to that a combined EPA fuel economy rating of 21 mpg, and it’s easy to pass on the beautiful Jaguar and envy-inspiring Benz.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Audi A8 4.2/A8 L 4.2 | 20 | 4.2 liter, 8 cyl., 6-AT |
| BMW 750i/750Li | 20 | 4.8 liter, 8 cyl., 6-AT | |
| Cadillac DTS | 20 | 4.6 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Infiniti M35/M35x | 20 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Infiniti M45 | 20 | 4.5 liter, 8 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Lincoln Town Car | 20 | 4.6 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mercedes S350 | 20 | 3.7 liter, 8 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 3rd Place | Jaguar XJ Super V8/XJR | 19 | 4.2 liter, 8 cyl., 6-AT |
| Mercedes S430 4Matic | 19 | 4.3 liter, 8 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Mercedes S500 | 19 | 5.8 liter, 8 cyl., 7-AT | |
| 4th Place | Mercedes S500 4Matic | 18 | 5.8 liter, 8 cyl., 5-AT |
| 5th Place | Audi A8 L 6.0 W12 | 17 | 6.0 liter, 12 cyl., 6-AT |
| BMW 760i/760Li | 17 | 6.0 liter, 12 cyl., 6-AT | |
| Mercedes S55 AMG | 17 | 5.4 liter, 8 cyl., 5-AT |
Small Wagon
1st Place (tie): 2006 Pontiac Vibe
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 31
Powertrain: 1.8 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place (tie): 2006 Scion xB
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 31
Powertrain: 1.5 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place (tie): 2006 Toyota Matrix
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 31
Powertrain: 1.8 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
Many consumers in need of cargo carrying space can avoid an expensive, fuel-thirsty SUV by choosing a small station wagon. Sure, the EPA calls them station wagons, but you can call them whatever lets you sleep at night. Choose something like Active Lifestyle Support Vehicle, or ALSV – the hottie at the gym won’t know what the heck you’re talking about, and you’ll be saving enough moolah to actually go on a date. Our pick of the top three in the class is the boxy Scion xB. Sure, it generates the least amount of power, but it’s fresh, functional and can be customized with a wide variety of dealer-installed equipment.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Pontiac Vibe AWD | 28 | 1.8 liter, 4cyl., 4-AT |
| Toyota Matrix AWD | 28 | 1.8 liter, 4cyl., 4-AT | |
| 3rd Place | Suzuki Aerio SX | 27 | 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| 4th Place | Suzuki Aerio SX AWD | 26 | 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| 5th Place | Subaru Impreza 2.5 TS | 25 | 2.5 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| Subaru Outback Sport | 25 | 2.5 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
Small Luxury Wagon
1st Place: 2006 Audi A3 2.0T
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 28
Powertrain: 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 6-AT
The 2006 Audi A3 is a fun-to-drive five-door offering the versatility of a small SUV with the comfort of a luxury sedan. Equipped with a zippy 2.0-liter, direct-injection motor combined with tight European handling characteristics, the Audi A3 is a must-drive when shopping for a small luxury wagon. Adding even more to its allure is the fact that it can go three more miles on every gallon of fuel than the 2nd place runners-up.
| Runners-up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Audi A4 2.0T Avant Quattro | 25 | 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 6-AT |
| Saab 9-3 SportCombi | 25 | 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Volvo V50 | 25 | 2.5 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Volvo V50 T5 | 25 | 2.4 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 3rd Place | Saab 9-2X | 24 | 2.5 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| 4th Place | Volvo V50 AWD | 23 | 2.5 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT |
| 5th Place | Saab 9-3 SportCombi Aero | 21 | 2.8 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT |
Mid-size Wagon
1st Place: 2006 Ford Focus
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 28
Powertrain: 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
Sure, you think the 2006 Ford Focus is a small car, but the wizards at the EPA claim it’s a mid-size model thanks to a classification system based on total interior volume – including the cargo area. And the Focus has a big cargo area. If you’re looking to combine fuel-efficiency with an emphasis on people-toting ability, check out the larger Subaru Legacy, which gets added power for 2006. But there’s no denying that the Focus is a fun-to-drive family hauler with a distinctive European look.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Subaru Legacy 2.5i | 26 | 2.5 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| 3rd Place | Dodge Magnum | 24 | 2.7 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT |
| 4th Place | Mazda 5 | 23 | 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT |
| 5th Place | Mazda 6 | 22 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT |
Mid-size Luxury Wagon
1st Place: 2006 Volvo V70 2.5T
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 24
Powertrain: 2.5 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT
Mid-size luxury wagons have enjoyed a recent resurgence in popularity, and the Volvo V70 has proven to be one of the sales leaders in the class, a favorite of families for its legacy of safety. But there’s another reason to choose the Volvo when shopping for a luxury wagon. When it comes to fuel economy, the V70 tops the field with a combined rating of 24 mpg.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | BMW 530xi | 23 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT |
| Volvo V70 2.5T AWD | 23 | 2.5 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Volvo V70 T5 | 23 | 2.4 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 3rd Place | Audi A6 3.2 Avant Quattro | 21 | 3.1 liter, 6 cyl., 6-AT |
| Mercedes E350 | 21 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 7-AT | |
| 4th Place | Mercedes E350 4Matic | 20 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 7-AT |
| Volvo V70R | 20 | 2.5 liter, 5 cyl., 6-AT | |
| 5th Place | Mercedes E500 | 17 | 5.8 liter, 8 cyl., 5-AT |
| Mercedes E55 AMG | 17 | 5.4 liter, 8 cyl., 5-AT |
Standard Truck, 2WD
1st Place: 2006 Ford Ranger
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 23
Powertrain: 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT
1st Place: 2006 Mazda B2300
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 23
Powertrain: 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT
1st Place: 2006 Toyota Tacoma
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 23
Powertrain: 2.7 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
Though the 2006 Ford Ranger and 2006 Mazda B-Series also rank first, our choice here is the 2006 Toyota Tacoma. Completely redesigned last year, the Tacoma is roomier and more refined, though it’s also more expensive. If you just need a good, cheap, fuel-efficient truck, get the Mazda. It’s the same thing as a Ranger, but with a better warranty. And if you need something bigger, try the Toyota Tundra with the base 4.0-liter V6.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Chevrolet Colorado | 21 | 3.5 liter, 5 cyl., 4-AT |
| GMC Canyon | 21 | 3.5 liter, 5 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Nissan Frontier | 21 | 2.5 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 3rd Place | Toyota Tacoma | 20 | 4.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
| Toyota Tundra | 20 | 4.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 4th Place | Chevrolet Colorado | 19 | 2.8 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| Ford Ranger | 19 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Ford Ranger | 19 | 4.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| GMC Canyon | 19 | 2.8 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Isuzu i-280 | 19 | 2.8 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mazda B3000 | 19 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 5th Place | Chevrolet Silverado 1500 | 18 | 4.3 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT |
| Chevrolet Silverado 1500 | 18 | 4.8 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Chevrolet Silverado 1500 | 18 | 5.3 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Dodge Dakota | 18 | 3.7 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Dodge Ram 1500 | 18 | 3.7 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| GMC Sierra 1500 | 18 | 4.3 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| GMC Sierra 1500 | 18 | 4.8 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| GMC Sierra 1500 | 18 | 5.3 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mazda B4000 | 18 | 4.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Mitsubishi Raider | 18 | 3.7 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Nissan Frontier | 18 | 4.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
Standard Truck, 4WD
1st Place: 2006 Chevrolet Colorado
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 19
Powertrain(s): 2.8 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT; 3.5 liter, 5 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place: 2006 GMC Canyon
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 19
Powertrain(s): 2.8 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT; 3.5 liter, 5 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place: 2006 Isuzu i-350
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 19
Powertrain(s): 3.5 liter, 5 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place: 2006 Toyota Tacoma
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 19
Powertrain(s): 4.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT
The 2006 Chevrolet Colorado, 2006 GMC Canyon, and 2006 Isuzu i-350 are all at the top of the 4WD pickup class at 19 mpg because they are essentially the same vehicles with the same engines. Our pick, however, is the larger, more refined 2006 Toyota Tacoma which ties this trio. And if you don’t need real off-road capability, the 2006 Honda Ridgeline, in 2nd Place, is an outstanding alternative. Full-size truck buyers will want to examine the 2006 Chevrolet Silverado and 2006 GMC Sierra if fuel economy is a strong consideration.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Ford Ranger | 18 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
| Honda Ridgeline | 18 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 3rd Place | Chevrolet Silverado 1500 | 17 | 4.8 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT |
| Chevrolet Silverado 1500 | 17 | 5.3 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Dodge Dakota | 17 | 3.7 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Dodge Dakota | 17 | 4.7 liter, 8 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Ford Ranger | 17 | 4.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| GMC Sierra 1500 | 17 | 4.8 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| GMC Sierra 1500 | 17 | 5.3 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mazda B4000 | 17 | 4.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Mitsubishi Raider | 17 | 3.7 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mitsubishi Raider | 17 | 4.7 liter, 8 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Nissan Frontier | 17 | 4.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 4th Place | Chevrolet Silverado 1500 | 16 | 4.3 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT |
| Dodge Ram 1500 | 16 | 5.7 liter, 8 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Ford F-150 | 16 | 4.6 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| GMC Sierra 1500 | 16 | 4.3 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Toyota Tundra | 16 | 4.7 liter, 8 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 5th Place | Chevrolet Silverado 1500 | 15 | 6.0 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT |
| Dodge Ram 1500 | 15 | 4.7 liter, 8 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Ford F-150 | 15 | 5.4 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| GMC Sierra 1500 | 15 | 6.0 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| GMC Sierra Denali | 15 | 6.0 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Lincoln Mark LT | 15 | 5.4 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Nissan Titan | 15 | 5.6 liter, 8 cyl., 5-AT |
Minivan
1st Place: 2006 Honda Odyssey
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 23
Powertrain: 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT
Clearly, all minivans on the market cluster around the 20-mpg mark when it comes to combined fuel economy ratings. But just one gets 23 mpg, and that’s the 2006 Honda Odyssey, thanks in part to its Variable Cylinder Management system that cuts fuel to three of the engine’s six cylinders when cruising on the highway. The Honda Odyssey was already the minivan to beat, and landing in the top slot with the best fuel economy in the class cements its post as the standard bearer.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Dodge Caravan | 22 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| Nissan Quest | 22 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| 3rd Place | Buick Terraza | 21 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT |
| Buick Terraza | 21 | 3.9 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Chevrolet Uplander | 21 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Chevrolet Uplander | 21 | 3.9 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Dodge Caravan | 21 | 3.3 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Honda Odyssey (no VCM) | 21 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Nissan Quest | 21 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Pontiac Montana SV6 | 21 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Pontiac Montana SV6 | 21 | 3.9 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Saturn Relay | 21 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Saturn Relay | 21 | 3.9 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Toyota Sienna | 21 | 3.3 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 4th Place | Chrysler Town & Country | 20 | 3.8 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT |
| Dodge Grand Caravan | 20 | 3.8 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT; | |
| Ford Freestar | 20 | 3.9 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Kia Sedona | 20 | 3.8 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Mazda MPV | 20 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 5th Place | Buick Terraza AWD | 19 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT |
| Chevrolet Uplander AWD | 19 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Ford Freestar | 19 | 4.2 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mercury Monterey | 19 | 4.2 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Pontiac Montana SV6 AWD | 19 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Saturn Relay AWD | 19 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Toyota Sienna AWD | 19 | 3.3 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
SUV, 2WD
1st Place: 2006 Chevrolet HHR
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 25
Powertrain: 2.2 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place: 2006 Honda CR-V
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 25
Powertrain: 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT
Why the EPA thinks that the 2006 Chevrolet HHR, which is basically a Chevy Cobalt station wagon, is a sport/utility vehicle is a mystery, but since our choice in the category, the 2006 Honda CR-V, is a jacked-up Civic with a big box hanging off the back, who are we to judge? We give the nod to the CR-V for its larger size, greater space, and more powerful engine. Plus, the darn things have proven to be nearly bulletproof in terms of reliability.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Ford Escape | 24 | 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| Honda Element | 24 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Hyundai Tucson | 24 | 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Kia Sportage | 24 | 2.0 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mazda Tribute | 24 | 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mercury Mariner | 24 | 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Saturn Vue | 24 | 2.2 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Toyota Highlander | 24 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| 3rd Place | Chrysler PT Cruiser | 23 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| Ford Freestyle | 23 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., CVT | |
| Hyundai Santa Fe | 23 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander | 23 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Saturn Vue | 23 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 4th Place | Ford Escape | 22 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT |
| Hyundai Santa Fe | 22 | 2.7 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Hyundai Tucson | 22 | 2.7 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Kia Sportage | 22 | 2.7 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mazda Tribute | 22 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mercury Mariner | 22 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Nissan Murano | 22 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., CVT | |
| 5th Place | Buick Rendezvous | 21 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT |
| Buick Rendezvous | 21 | 3.6 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Chevrolet Equinox | 21 | 3.4 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Pontiac Torrent | 21 | 3.4 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara | 21 | 2.7 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Toyota Highlander | 21 | 3.3 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
SUV, 4WD
1st Place: 2006 Subaru Forester
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 25
Powertrain: 2.5 liter 4 cyl., 4-AT
1st Place: 2006 Subaru Outback
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 25
Powertrain: 2.5 liter 4 cyl., 4-AT
Subaru locks up first place in the 4WD SUV category with two separate models that use the same, horizontally-opposed, flat four-cylinder drivetrain – the restyled 2006 Forester and the appealing 2006 Outback. Though close in overall size and identical in terms of power, performance, and fuel economy, the Forester appeals more to those looking for the boxy, upright styling of a traditional SUV while the Outback is more like a car or station wagon in terms of appearance. Of the two, the Outback is our favorite, though either will prove to be a reliable weather-beater for years to come.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Honda CR-V | 24 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT |
| Subaru Baja | 24 | 2.5 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| 3rd Place | Jeep Liberty CRD | 23 | 2.8 liter, 4 cyl., 5-AT |
| 4th Place | Ford Escape | 22 | 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT |
| Honda Element | 22 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mazda Tribute | 22 | 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mercury Mariner | 22 | 2.3 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander | 22 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Subaru Outback | 22 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Toyota Highlander | 22 | 2.4 liter, 4 cyl., 4-AT | |
| 5th Place | Buick Rendezvous | 21 | 3.6 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT |
| Ford Escape | 21 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Ford Freestyle | 21 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., CVT | |
| Hyundai Tucson | 21 | 2.7 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Kia Sportage | 21 | 2.7 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mazda Tribute | 21 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Mercury Mariner | 21 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Nissan Murano | 21 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., CVT | |
| Saturn Vue | 21 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara | 21 | 2.7 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Toyota Highlander | 21 | 3.3 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
Luxury SUV
1st Place: 2006 Lexus RX 330 2WD
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 22
Powertrain: 3.3 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT
1st Place: 2006 Volvo XC70
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 22
Powertrain: 2.5-liter, 5-cyl., 5-AT
Since the 2006 Volvo XC70 is merely a Volvo station wagon raised a few inches for more ground clearance, it’s not surprising that it ties for first with the 2006 Lexus RX 330 in the Luxury SUV category. Comfortable and sure-footed in all kinds of weather, the XC70 is a fine, if often overlooked, sport-ute. But our choice here is the Lexus, unless you absolutely require four driven wheels (and if so, the RX 330 AWD slots into 2nd Place). But if you need real off-roading capability, your best bet is the 2006 Hummer H3, Lexus GX 470, or Porsche Cayenne.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Powertrain |
| 2nd Place | Lexus RX 330 | 21 | 3.3 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
| 3rd Place | Acura MDX | 19 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
| BMW X3 | 19 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Cadillac SRX 2WD | 19 | 3.6 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Volvo XC90 | 19 | 2.5 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Volvo XC90 2WD | 19 | 2.5 liter, 5 cyl., 5-AT | |
| 4th Place | BMW X5 3.0i | 18 | 3.0 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT |
| BMW X5 4.4i | 18 | 4.4 liter, 8 cyl., 6-AT | |
| BMW X5 4.8is | 18 | 4.8 liter, 8 cyl., 6-AT | |
| Cadillac SRX AWD | 18 | 3.6 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Mercedes ML350 | 18 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 7-AT | |
| Mercedes R350 | 18 | 3.5 liter, 6 cyl., 7-AT | |
| Saab 9-7X | 18 | 4.2 liter, 6 cyl., 4-AT | |
| 5th Place | Cadillac SRX | 17 | 4.6 liter, 8 cyl., 5-AT |
| Hummer H3 | 17 | 3.5 liter, 5 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Lexus GX 470 | 17 | 4.7 liter, 8 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Porsche Cayenne | 17 | 3.2 liter, 6 cyl., 5-AT | |
| Saab 9-7X | 17 | 5.3 liter, 8 cyl., 4-AT | |
| Volvo XC90 | 17 | 4.4 liter, 8 cyl., 6-AT |
Hybrids
1st Place: 2006 Honda Insight
Combined EPA Fuel Economy: 56 mpg
Vehicle Classification: Two-seater
Honda’s odd-looking Insight, the first hybrid to go on sale to consumers in North America, is also the thriftiest with fuel – but just barely. The much larger, more comfortable, impressively refined, and surprisingly useful Toyota Prius nips at the Insight’s heels. We’d recommend skipping the Insight for the Prius any day of the week, though with just a handful sold each year, you can bet there’s no waiting line at the Honda dealer for this funky two-seater.
| Runners-Up | Make and Model | Combined MPG | Vehicle Classification |
| 2nd Place | Toyota Prius | 55 | Mid-size Car |
| 3rd Place | Honda Civic Hybrid | 50 | Compact Car |
| 4th Place | Ford Escape Hybrid 2WD | 33 | SUV |
| Mazda Tribute Hybrid 2WD | 33 | SUV | |
| Mercury Mariner Hybrid 2WD | 33 | SUV | |
| 5th Place | Honda Accord Hybrid | 32 | Mid-size Car |
Photos courtesy of the manufacturers