Facebook Logo Facebook Logo 2 Twitter Logo i_gplus i_copyurl i_plus i_minus i_reddit i_envelope search youtube-play feed2 user-tie arrow-right-thick location icon-wagons icon-diesel icon-hatchback icon-hybrid enlarge shrink camera

Ford Trucks Ratings

Getting firsthand information from an actual car owner is one sure way to get an idea of car performance once it leaves the lot. Autobytel features real consumer reviews that give the unbiased experience of a car.

Choose Your Vehicle -
Search Car Ratings for Ford Trucks
Trucks Ford All Models
    • Overall
    • Comfort
    • Performance
    • Quality
    • Appearance

    2/8/2002 1:58:54 AM

    2002 Ford F-250 - XLT 4x2 SD Crew Cab Short Box

    Pros: size of the interior and the 6 way power seats

    Cons: My truck is perfect and sound

    Advice: Go with the 4 door crew cab it's worth the small price for the extra room

    I test drove this truck up and down the highway with good take off speed for a truck of its size and weight. This truck is solid and quiet. The captain seats are must on the crew cab. They are firm but comfortable. There is alot of storage space inside the cab with a good size space behind the rear seat. Ford did a great job combining the look and feel of a big truck while still making it a comfortable ride on long trips.

    • Overall
    • Comfort
    • Performance
    • Quality
    • Appearance

    2/7/2002 1:51:18 PM

    2002 Ford F-150 SuperCrew - XLT 4x4 SuperCrew Cab Styleside Styleside

    Pros: the look of the vehicle

    Cons: The seats

    Advice: get true bucket seats

    This vehicle is uncomfortable to sit in. The seats, unless they are truly bucket seats are uncomfortable.

    • Overall
    • Comfort
    • Performance
    • Quality
    • Appearance

    1/6/2002 11:53:51 AM

    2002 Ford Ranger - XLT 2.3L Standard (380A) 4x2 2dr Super Cab Stylesi

    Pros: Rear wheel drive

    Cons: lack of power and uncomfortable seats

    Advice: look elsewhere. If you must, definitely buy the largest (4.0L) engine!!!

    This Ranger is an extended cab with the 3.0L V6. The seats are among the most uncomfortable I have ever used. Fuel economy is dismal at 14 in the city and 16.5 on the road. The 3.0L engine is very sluggish. 0-60 is around 13 seconds. A 1998 Windstar with the 3.0L V6 can easily best this by 2.5 seconds while getting 4 - 6 mpg better fuel economy. Unless you feel compelled to drive a small sluggish uncomfortable pickup, your money would be better spent elsewhere. Passing performance is a joke. This vehicle borders on dangerous with respect to pickup needed to safely merge into freeway traffic. If you look at the engine specs and weight of the vehicle on paper, it looks as if it should have more then acceptable performance, but in reality, it feels like driving a mid 80's Chrysler K car. Obviously Ford did not pay attention to owners of past versions of this vehicle. We have several in our fleet replacing Ford Windstar vans. Not one person driving this vehicle has anything good to say about it.

    • Overall
    • Comfort
    • Performance
    • Quality
    • Appearance

    12/30/2001 2:01:55 PM

    2002 Ford F-250 - XLT 4x4 SD Super Cab Short Box

    Pros: Fuel mileage & comfort

    Cons: Bad vibration & numerous rattles in doors & windows

    Advice: Test drive a must

    Mine equipped w/diesel. Has bad vibration on initial take off. FMC says this is normal. If this is normal they should make people aware of this before selling.