Volvo V50 Review
| Ratings |
|
|
| Overall: |
 
|
| Comfort: |
|
| Performance: |
|
| Quality: |
|
| Appearance: |
|
|
| Comments |
Favorite feature: |
Design of the interior |
Least favorite feature: |
Small arm rest |
Advice to buyer: |
Not worth the price if going over $30 |
Detailed review: |
This car does not drive as good as it looks. There seems to be a lot of pulling to either side. The turbo can be peppy, but there is a random lag in power that I was told is normal? I expected a better driving experience because of their reputation. I think that being part of Ford Motor Co. and sharing parts with Ford Focus & Mazda 3 may have something to do with it's lack of quality. I regret the purchase. |
Also considered: |
2005 Audi A4
2005 Volkswagen Golf
|
Vehicle purchased: |
2005 Volvo V50
|
|
| About This Reviewer... |
Location: |
Chicago, Illinois |
Other vehicles owned: |
2000 Lexus SC 300
2002 Jaguar XK
|
Review submitted: |
May 18, 2006 |
Is this review offensive or grossly inaccurate? Let us know.
|
Note: Autobytel.com provides Customer Test Drives as an open forum for individuals to
share their views during the test drive experience. The opinions, comments and views expressed in this
section are solely those of such individuals. Neither Autobytel.com, its subsidiaries and affiliates,
nor any Autobytel.com subscribing dealer or vehicle manufacturer endorse any view or opinion
expressed in this section unless specifically noted.
|
|
 |
|
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
|
|
